On Tuesday 12 January 2010, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > And it wouldn't create new headaches like ending up with > > an old version of a discrete 'startup.tcl' ... or missing > > any version whatsoever. > > Another thing that I was thinking about: how about using a > startup.tcl on disk if it is there?
Same mess: that's all deep internals of the server, and when such things start getting out of sync things will go REALLY wacky. > That would also remove the most urgent need for dumping the > builtin startup.tcl. > > There are LOTS of files that openocd ships with that users can > depend on, startup.tcl isn't *that* special. Users don't depend on startup.tcl; the server itself does. And it's not exactly a customizable thing ... there's all sorts of internals there which we don't document and don't really want to be supporting random changes to. - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
