> > >/ -----Original Message----- > />/ From: openocd-development-bounces at lists.berlios.de > <https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development> > [mailto:openocd- > />/ development-bounces at lists.berlios.de > <https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development>] On Behalf Of > Austin, Alex > />/ Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 4:45 PM > />/ To: openocd-development at lists.berlios.de > <https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development> > />/ Subject: [Openocd-development] Add support for multiple-ports on > />/ FT4232H > />/ > />/ I doubt this is the right way to do things, but it hasn't broken > />/ anything yet. This is just providing framework support for an adapter > />/ with reset lines driven by BDBUS instead of ACBUS. > />/ > />/ I don't expect this to be in 0.4-RC<anything>, but I wouldn't mind > />/ another set of eyes. > />/ - Alex > /
I am a bit worry seeing your code, and the idea to mix both A channel (JTAG) and B channel (SRST) bus. If you really have to mix A and B for the same functionality as the Amontec JTAGkey or other Dongles in the driver ft2232.c, you should have to write a new driver as ft2232_mixed_channel.c . You only complicate the code and make SPEED regression including your idea/code in the actual ft2232.c. For All: DO NOT ACCEPT TO CHANGE FT2232.c for mixed channels. For Alex : PLEASE CREATE A NEW DRIVER ! Best regards, Laurent http://www.amontec.com making JTAG a Snap by NEW Amontec JTAGkey-2 5x - 8x faster than the popular JTAGkey _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
