On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Yegor Yefremov <yegorsli...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:49 AM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> Much to my surprise, I observed a "flash erase_address ..." >> command erasing data which I didn't say should be erased. >> >> The issue turns out to be generic NOR flash code which was >> silently, and rather dangerously, morphing partial-sector >> references into unrequested whole-sector ones. >> >> This patch removes that low-level morphing. If desired, it >> can and should be done in higher level code.
I missed this patch in the flurry... Don't push it(if it has already, then it should be reverted). The whole point of flash erase_address is to allow an address range to be erased without knowing the precise sector boundaries. There are "low level" commands that can erase only sectors in a specific bank if that is what you are looking for. -- Øyvind Harboe US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00 http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
