Thanks.  I broke it, but I just pushed a patch to fix this properly.

On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 02:05 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> looks like the NAND isn't registered at all. I use the following (incorrect) 
> patch to work it around FTTB.
> 
> diff --git a/src/flash/nand/tcl.c b/src/flash/nand/tcl.c
> index e69882b..15426e9 100644
> --- a/src/flash/nand/tcl.c
> +++ b/src/flash/nand/tcl.c
> @@ -580,6 +580,13 @@ static COMMAND_HELPER(create_nand_device, const char 
> *bank_name,
>                 return ERROR_OK;
>         }
> 
> +       if (nand_devices) {
> +               struct nand_device *p = nand_devices;
> +               while (p && p->next) p = p->next;
> +               p->next = c;
> +       } else
> +               nand_devices = c;
> +
>         return ERROR_OK;
>  }
> _______________________________________________
> Openocd-development mailing list
> Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to