On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:22 AM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: > On Thursday 10 December 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> + /* FIX!!!! this is a kludge!!! arm926ejs.c should >> reimplement this arm_jtag_set_instr to >> + * have special verification code. >> + */ >> + jtag_add_ir_scan_noverify(1, &field, jtag_get_end_state()); > > What's that about? Is the comment still relevant? ISTR > deleting some old unused crap in arm926 a while back...
The ir code returned from arm926ejs is incorrect. The only motivation for verifying the ir code, AFAIK, is to have more checks on the communication, i.e. arm926ejs would have to implement this fn itself. I think that conditional code is going to cause more trouble that it is worth here, better just not to verify it... we haven't for ages. -- Øyvind Harboe US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00 http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
