On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 22:33 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > I'm concerned about doing a lot more work on 0.4. I would > like to see what our track record is with this amount of changes > w.r.t. breakage. > > The changes you are proposing look *great* but I wonder if > they shouldn't be spread out over 0.4, 0.5 and possibly > also 0.6 to get enough feedback on the work along > the way.
I hereby propose that we fork a major revision, allowing these changes to go into that branch. You have described reasons to justify completely overhauling the JTAG layer in OpenOCD. I know these reasons exists, and I think that it would outright _stupid_ of us to do it in phases. We should bite the bullet and fix all of the problems at once, and _then_ do *one* round of regression testing and fixed. That sound a whole lot like a major revision to me. I do _not_ want to suffer through several minor releases, fixing one part of the problem at a time. Sincerely, Zach Welch Corvallis, OR _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
