On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 23:03 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > Just a heads-up/ping ... the original notion of the 0.4.0 schedule > has RC1 in a couple weeks, and I think we should still plan on that. > > Is any ongoing major work not likely to finish by then?
Yes, but that doesn't mean it can't be put on hold for a time. :) I will be aggressively supportive of keeping a regular release schedule, though I am glad that you are taking the lead. > Are there patches that seem to have been forgotten, which should > not have been? If so, please repost against mainline. > > > After RC1 the focus will be stabilization and bugfixing. I count > "doesn't support <hardware X>" as fairly buglike, note, but later > in the RC series that won't be enough to get new code merged. > Given the amount of stuff that changed, I'm also thinking that the > RC phase should likely be closer to a month this time around, not > just a week or two. That sounds like a long time, so I would rather say it depends on feedback from the first couple of releases. If we don't get any bug reports (hah!), then there is no reason for a long release window. That said, the last -rc needs at least a week before turning final, so it could well become a month if we turn out 3 of them. --Z _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
