Yeah, sorry Dean. I know it impacts you, but -- as I said -- I think that it will be relatively easy to merge your changes after the refactoring. I Want To Believe that Git is that smart. The truth will be out there, waiting for you in your tree when you get back to it. ;)
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 17:52 -0600, Dean Glazeski wrote: > Aargh, darn school! I can't keep up with these patches, but do it! > This leaves some room for work I want to do when I have time again :). > > // Dean Glazeski > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Zach Welch <z...@superlucidity.net> > wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to clean up our flash directory, moving the files into > subdirectories and simplifying the nand filenames. This paves > the way > for future types of flash technologies, drivers for which seem > like they > could be imminent. It simplifies another proposal of mine > appreciably, > so I want to see this work done before putting it up for > discussion. > > Git seems pretty smart about moved files, so this changes > should not be > _too_ painful for others to rebase branches based on these > files.... > Any objections if I create and push this trivial (if invasive) > patch? > > Cheers, > > Zach > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development > _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
