Pushed, with another minor-but-related help text fix. Thanks!
--Z
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 08:36 -0500, Eric Wetzel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 'flash erase_sector' and 'flash protect' have not been working for me
> recently. Passing them the correct number of arguments (3 and 4,
> respectively) returns the usage message, but passing them each one
> argument less than they require crashes the program.
>
> I believe the problem was introduced in commit
> ff61e6a37ce79f00957fc5aeb304291e5fa06323.
>
> I've included a trivial patch and tested that those changes work.
>
> Thanks,
> ~Eric
>
> diff --git a/src/flash/flash.c b/src/flash/flash.c
> index e2136b7..0a735f9 100644
> --- a/src/flash/flash.c
> +++ b/src/flash/flash.c
> @@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static int flash_check_sector_parameters(struct
> command_cont
> ext *cmd_ctx,
>
> COMMAND_HANDLER(handle_flash_erase_command)
> {
> - if (CMD_ARGC != 2)
> + if (CMD_ARGC != 3)
> return ERROR_COMMAND_SYNTAX_ERROR;
>
> uint32_t bank_nr;
> @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ COMMAND_HANDLER(handle_flash_erase_command)
>
> COMMAND_HANDLER(handle_flash_protect_command)
> {
> - if (CMD_ARGC != 3)
> + if (CMD_ARGC != 4)
> return ERROR_COMMAND_SYNTAX_ERROR;
>
> uint32_t bank_nr;
> _______________________________________________
> Openocd-development mailing list
> Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
