On Wednesday 25 November 2009, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Dean Glazeski a écrit :
> > This patch shouldn't be necessary. I have the libftdi version working
> > fine with current head. I think this might be an issue with mixing
> > libraries in the configure command. I've responded to the next email
> > with more information.
> >
> > // Dean Glazeski
>
> Well it shouldn't be, but it is :) and no, this is not an issue of
> mixing libraries, not in my case anyway, as my ./configure only
> configures the opensource lib (and I suspect it to be the case for the
> OP too).
>
> On my system, libftdi, built from git, places its header files in
> ${prefix}/include/libftdi, and thus compiling for it requires a -I --
> even worse, for libftdi examples, it requires -isystem rather than -I.
Sounds like a libftdi isssue ... you might ping that list
to see what they have to say, and if it's fixable before
the 0.17 release goes out.
Or maybe you should just find better config options to use.
I see that recent Debian doesn't need /usr/include/ftdi, for
example:
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/amd64/libftdi-dev/filelist
Maybe they treat this /usr/include/ftdi thing as a bug and
work around it ... :)
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
