On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Zach Welch wrote: > On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 21:55 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Zach Welch wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 16:33 -0600, Dean Glazeski wrote: > > > > First of all, screw you for all of these patches. Frekin' 80+ emails! > > > > > > Yeah, sorry. ;) I particularly apologize for 'git send-email' failing > > > to properly thread the messages for each series under their summaries. > > > > Did you invoke 'git send-email' for each series separately? If no then > > you should have. If yes then this is definitively a send-email bug. > > I did it in one line, assuming that it would work as it did when I ran > it by hand. We both seem to have expected it to have worked better: > > for i in $(seq 1 6); do > git send-email patches/reg$i \ > --to=openocd-developm...@lists.berlios.de \ > --from...@superlucidity.net \ > --in-reply-to=1259100144.20337.4503.ca...@localhost > done
Your usage of --in-reply-to is wrong. That made all patch series to end up in the same thread. Nicolas _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
