On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:34, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> I guess we have very different approaches to looking at new software. >> Since the structures (classes) are the skeleton > > There's a book titled something like "structs + methods = programs". :) > > When I'm analysing code to see how it works inside, I consider it > a flaw if I can't look through the headers and get a basic feel > for the key types and their operations. Those headers are where > the interfaces between components get defined ... or at least, > they should be. On well written and maintainable code, the headers > are very usable for such purposes. (OpenOCD isn't there yet.) >
I guess it just goes to show how out of touch with the openocd source code I am that I was still operating under the assumption that the headers are exactly the place where the structs are defined... Michael _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
