We discussed the release numbers early this year. We wanted a numbering scheme that most users of OpenOCD would understand immediately without any explanation.
0.3.0 => the first 0 is meaningful. It conveys that we feel that it still needs a lot of work. Not only in terms of code but also process and community. 3 => the real release number trailing 0 => we have yet to cut a bugfix release as we intend to have short cycles. Lets keep things as-is unless there is wide agreement to switch to something *significantly* better. As cycles can be *long* in embedded development, there is nothing wrong with using a tool that is several years old, so I'm glad the date/year isn't in there. -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
