On Monday 02 November 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > > > That is, encapsulate the "step" (or disassemble, etc) > > logic in an object that's distinct from the target. > > > > That's a good general technique. It's wrong to have > > stuffed *everything* in the target class hierarchy; > > there are other kinds of entities, which should be > > loosely coupled to targets (not *tightly* as now). > > So in any decent OO system, it's possible to optionally implement > interfaces such as the above...
I look at it as having multiple objects. Today's OpenOCD code is pretty much all structured arount one "target". Better that "target" be a cluster of related objects, yes with their own types. There are more relationships than just subtyping... _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
