On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 00:12, Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.har...@zylin.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Michael Bruck <mbr...@digenius.de> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:37, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: >>> If the arm11 (armv6) stuff isn't layering on top of that, I'm >>> sort of curious why. If the reason is anything more than the >> >> It didn't seem practical at the time because it would have taken >> significantly more time. > > At the end of the day, this may end up pushing us to > define cleaner interfaces. Perhaps not such a bad > thing in the long run....
It isn't just about the interfaces. I would have had to understand what exactly the armv4_5 etc code does and what it's side-effects are. But the code is hopelessly bloated. Reading a simple local copy of PC is a drama of epic proportions: buf_get_u32(armv4_5->core_cache->reg_list[15].value, 0, 32) Michael _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
