On Thursday 22 October 2009, Colin Howarth wrote:
> 1318,1319c1318,1319
> < LOG_ERROR("should never reach this point");
> < return -1;
> ---
> > snprintf(instruction->text, 128, "0x%8.8" PRIx32 "\t0x%8.8" PRIx32
> "\tDATA", address, opcode);
> > return 0;
So you propose that every place the disassembler
receives garbage it should print it out as DATA?
Or just that *one* place?
Better approach: treat them all as undefined opcodes.
That's more correct, in any case...
If you could provide a fix in the format "git diff"
produces, such a change could be applied as a patch
using "patch -p1 < yourstuff" and then merged.
Note that you should generate such a patch against
the latest code. You can download a snapshot from
the gitweb interface, if you like. In any case,
like 1318 doesn't look *anything* like that in the
current code, so I have no idea which of the many
stupid "should not reach this point" messages you
ran into ...
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
