On Thursday 15 October 2009, Austin, Alex wrote: > > > > Removing those four commits brings the repo from 99MB to 5MB. > > > While doing so would destroy history that others' use, it > > > would be a great boon to those who are cloning it for the > > > first time, and would not be difficult for the rest of us > > > to synchronize with. > > > > > > Any takers? > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong... but fixing this basically involves a > > rebase of that year's work. (Or so it seems with my current level > > of homework...) > > > > Which more or less means everyone would be getting a new tree, > > when all is done. Yes? > > Yup. Actually, I already did that in a local repo I have. Pushing > it would be easy enough.
I have a tree that removes those commits plus a few other bits of noise that crept in. Thing is, pushing it would NOT be enough to achieve the full cleanup. The existing clones would need some cleanup/updating... > > I'm not averse to getting that crap out of the repository, > > and doing it sooner is better than later ... but I'd just > > want to be sure the impact is understood. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
