On Saturday 10 October 2009, Wookey wrote: > This syntax makes it rather easier to have more than one expected-id > too (althogh I still think a better solution there in the medium term > is to specify the components of the ID (vendor/device/stepping) and > allow don't-care bits.
At the moment the worst that can happen with a wrong IDCODE value is that you get a warning, so in a sense they're all "don't care"... _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
