On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Michael Schwingen
<rincew...@discworld.dascon.de> wrote:
> Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> I loathe options.... perhaps we can add some if we have to.
>>
> That is OK with me.
>> The old behavior is kinda buggy.... What alternative behavior
>> do you have in mind?
>>
> I have no better idea - if this works as proposed (ie. the change does
> not cause problems with debuggers including add-ons like ddd, eclipse
> etc. - are there other debuggers beside gdb that talk the same
> protocol?), then the change is OK with me.
>
> I have no reason to expect problems - I like the proposed behaviour,
> only I do not have enough detailed knowledge to be sure, and I have
> worked exclusively on targets where attaching to a running target was
> not possible anyway.

I believe the current patch is OK, but I may have to commit it
to svn head before we get some serious real-world evaluation
of the concepts & implementation...

-- 
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to