On Thursday 10 September 2009, Duane Ellis wrote: > When this idea would be bad: Little quick downloads
Depends how little... > When this idea would be good: BULK transfers, flash programing, etc. > > The idea is this: > Let us assume there is a 4K block (working space) of ram some where. > The code could be 2K, set aside 1K for stack (yes 1K) > And 1K for a download buffer - could be bigger.. .... not sure I see why this would be better than the existing algo framework, which loads smaller snippets (rarely 100 bytes) on an as-needed basis. However, another way of looking at it: you suggest a limited and standardized kind of "debug monitor" to be used in some cases, as an adjunct to current halt-mode debugging (instead of running in conjunction with the program-being-debugged). Again, this is what the existing "algo" framework does -- just, not with any kind of standard command set. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
