I have tested your svf file, and found no problem.
I don't have the target CPLD UR using, so I remove the verification.

2009/7/21 Wookey <woo...@wookware.org>

> +++ David Brownell [2009-07-20 15:53 -0700]:
> > On Monday 20 July 2009, Wookey wrote:
> > > Error: BUG: TAP path doesn't finish in a stable state
> >
> > I'd have thought that was a requirememnt for (X)SVF... it's hard
> > to decrypt the binary XSVF,
>
> Which is why I put up the svf file too:
> http://balloonboard.org/files/balloon3/openocd/bugrep/l3cpld.svf
>
> > so I'll just note the theory that for
> > some reason the Xilinx tools don't generate output conforming to
> > their published spec (as something to confirm or disprove).
>
> A very plausible theory. I have not read the svf spec, so have very
> weak understanding of what exactly it does.
>
> > Looks like r1980 creating jtag_add_statemove() from the XSVF-specific
> > code might have seeded this problem ... if later changes to the
> statemove()
> > logic turned some things into errors.  Do r1979 and r1980 behave, or was
> > it already incompatible then?
>
> Cheers for that pointer. I will test the above, but I have only 1 day
> before leaving for debconf, and 2 weeks underground afterwards, so it
> could be a while.
>
> Wookey
> --
> Principal hats:  iEndian - Balloonboard - Toby Churchill - Emdebian
> http://wookware.org/
> _______________________________________________
>  Openocd-development mailing list
> Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
>



-- 
Best Regards, SimonQian
http://www.SimonQian.com
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to