On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Peter Denison<open...@marshadder.org> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > >> We need to move on with development and j-link is still being >> discussed actively. 0.2 is likely to be cut in the next 24-48 hours. >> >> We'll be releasing 0.3 soon after 0.2 anyway(a month or two), so >> this shouldn't be so bad. There are a handful of other problems >> for which there are workarounds that won't go into 0.2 also. > > OK. So J-Link will stay as it currently is until after 0.2.0. That's > probably expedient to get the release out, and there will be people wanting > to sort it out post-0.2.0 for a quick 0.3 release. That's good. > > If I could return to the original point of this thread - getting the USBprog > adapter to work at all - in the light of the other comments, are you going > to let the one-line "make it work for now" fix in before 0.2?
The downside to slipping in this fix is that it will be harder to retire the undocumented tms_sequence command and who's going to put in the work to fix it on the C side now? Also, I find it strange, but I'm not going to dive into USBprog, that it is possible to support pathmove, but not short sequences... -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://www.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
