On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:01 +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote: > Zach Welch pisze: > > Technically, I agree. Politically, I think it better to find a solution > > for binary distribution. That said, the technical argument probably > > deserves to win. Others need to provide feedback; I will not dictate > > our release goals, but I will help lead us to them. > > As English is the second language I know, I'm really confused about what > exactly do you mean... Any clarifications please?
You cut the context, but Rick was saying something like: the OpenOCD project produces source code, why should we worry about binaries? Why not just put in a warning during configure and be done with it? I say: yes, true. But that's not playing nice with others, is it? Furthermore, I do NOT want to decide for everyone and be a dictator. After others chime in (or not), I will decide what we will do next, as part of my responsibilities of managing the release process. Does that help clarify it? :) Language is tricky, but I think my English is as fluent as it goes. If you are to judge, maybe not so. ;) Cheers, Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
