Freddie Chopin wrote: > 2. Modular OpenOCD which would allow binary "drivers" to be used (just > as the drivers are used in Linux kernel) > > PRO - possibility to use closed-source drivers (same as above), no need > for running additional software other than OpenOCD, no speed penalty of > the medium > What kind of module interface do you envision that would avoid the problems which we currently have with the FTD2XX library?
The drivers would have to run in a separate process space, which means Note: Linux kernel modules need to be GPL, too - the only way to have non-GPL drivers in Linux is to have userspace drivers, which are quite limited in capabilities. cu Michael _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
