David Brownell pisze: > Notice the complete disregard of technical arguments here. > > That's a good sign that the person making the argument has no real > contribution to make, beyond invective.
That's probably because I'm a USER, not a contributor. Quite simple. > Under the GPL. From the very first public release, that has been > part of it. You download it, and the GPL is there. That brings > along with it certain rules. GPL. GPL. GPL... How about Users, Users, Users? Again - The Most Important Qestion - Is OpenOCD meant for users to use, or just to be "100%-GPL-at-any-cost"? > You're the ONLY one advocating a "we-don't-care-for-X" mindset. Damn, I see that the opposite way - 5-10 ppl are "100% GPL" (that's where you are) while everyone else is like "why create artificial problems?". > You're also *falsely attributing* a mindset to other people. > That's often called "lying". Whatever. 4\/3!! _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
