LMAO That could be said for a lot of the recent messages on this list!
A very LOW signal to Noise ratio Lets start talking about solutions tom On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 23:27 +0000, Photo Leecher wrote: > People can already do what you say... They can merge+build the latest > and use FTDI2xx. > Amount of information: 0 > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > From: Thomas A. Moulton <t...@moulton.us> > To: Photo Leecher <photoleec...@yahoo.co.uk> > Cc: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > Sent: Wednesday, 24 June, 2009 0:24:09 > Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] License > > On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:59 +0000, Photo Leecher wrote: > > Your copy would have the exception because you got revision X. > > Revision X+1 would not, and therefore you wouldn't be able to > > distribute FTDI2XX any longer as part of >= X+1. > > > > People who want to keep revision X 5 years later can do so, but > would > > no longer get the latest-and-greatest code. > > > I could merge any patches I wanted to and release... > > Like I said it would be complex.. That was my only point > > tom > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
