On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:21 +0200, Nico Coesel wrote: [snip] > And here is the exact reason why the JTAG vendors are not going to put > effort into OpenOCD. A marriage works both ways!
The wife wants to cheat on me. What, I'm suppose to just be a cuckold? > I know I promised to contribute some go-along-the-road driver > development documentation. The task of creating a driver for an FPGA > JTAG accellerator is on my plate. However at the present I'm not sure > if I'm willing to contribute any more. I'd rather contribute to an > OpenOCD fork that is geared towards allowing as many people possible > to use OpenOCD as conveniently as possible. You seriously misunderstand open source software. How will proprietary software enable "as many people as possible" to use OpenOCD? You are selling out for "convenience" instead of sticking to developing a open solution that will give far more people a solution. Cheers, Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
