On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:57 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> I am also thinking that the USB timeout value may be extended a bit >> >> longer. >> >> Right now it is 1000ms. Should be ok. But may not be ok for people >> >> using VM or similar. >> > >> > The problem with this is that it slows down the failure process when >> > something is actually broken. I think more intelligence is needed, not >> > just a different default setting. > > Considering that USB bulk transfers are "best effort" and might easily > be delayed by concurrent activity to a USB disk or webcam ... a single > second seems absurdly short. Even if the device were guaranteed to be > able to respond that quickly.
Yes this is what I think as well. I do not know what is the best value though. What do you think? -- Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
