Dirk, did this happen when you used the drscan/irscan commands? Given that this is only an assert I think we'll have to add more checking to these commands to give meaningful errors if someone uses them incorrectly.
Michael On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Rick Altherr <kc8...@kc8apf.net> wrote: > > On May 20, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Dirk Behme wrote: > >> >> Just want to let you know that with recent svn head r1870 I get >> >> trying to validate configured JTAG chain anyway... >> openocd: jtag.c:889: interface_jtag_add_dr_scan: Assertion `field == >> out_fields + scan->num_fields' failed. >> >> while at least r1865 seems to work. Found while playing with OMAP3 >> scripts. >> >> Best regards >> >> Dirk >> _______________________________________________ >> Openocd-development mailing list >> Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de >> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development > > > The assert fires when interface_jtag_add_dr_scan() is called with fields for > taps that are in bypass. Technically not a hard error, but this does mean > that unnecessary data is being passed around. Can you run in the debugger > and get a backtrace when this happens? > > -- > Rick Altherr > kc8...@kc8apf.net > > "He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it > with him." > -- Unsigned > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development > > _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
