On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Rick Altherr <kc8...@kc8apf.net> wrote:
>
> On May 17, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Michael Bruck wrote:
>
>> - remove stale interdepencies between arm11 and arm7_9_common
>> - added comments
>> - fixed some indentation
>>
>>
>> Michael
>> <openocd-arm11-small-fixes>_______________________________________________
>> Openocd-development mailing list
>> Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
>
>
>
> Is there someone more familiar with the ARM11 code that can comment on this?
>  From my knowledge, ARM11 is an ARMv6 part and shouldn't have a dependency
> on the ARMv4/5 code.  Sadly, I don't know enough about OpenOCD's
> implementation of the ARM target support to know if separating them is
> correct.
>

The other ARM code is layered so that more advanced cores re-use the
code of earlier cores. But that is a huge sparsely documented package
that I didn't have time to dig into during the ARM11 port. That is why
ARM11 is a clean room port that is not connected to the other ARM
layers.

The dependencies are there because I used a skeleton from another
driver as starting point and never got around analyzing what this bit
of code does. I only found it now after the doxygen docs highlighted
some unexpected dependencies in the header files.


Michael
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to