On May 15, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Magnus Lundin wrote:
Øyvind Harboe wrote:I've made a quick attempt at modifying the patch to be against svn head, can't test beyond building it though. This took me a couple of minutes, so this patch is only very slightly different in svn head/1606. Looking at the patch, it occurs to me that from a testing/bisection point of view, it would be possible to break this into a number of patches. This would be *greatly* helpful if we need to go back and check if something subtle broke here... ?Well, the modifications to jtag.c are very minor :) The ft2232 stuff is actually a unit, it will hardly build otherwise (Dick told us so and here he was right) I did not include the 2232h and the reconnect parts, they can (easily) be applied later. The JLink is separate and it will be clear if we are using jlink or ft2232 :) I think you should be happy that I did not include the cortex work in this patch, thats a big one ... Have a great evening Magnus _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
I'd like to see the jtag.c changes as patch #1, ft2232 as #2, and JLink as #3. I'm fine with the ft2232 being a big patch, but I don't like having the JTAG changes mixed with the drivers.
-- Rick Altherr kc8...@kc8apf.net"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
-- Unsigned
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
