Exactly. This is what that type was designed to do. On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 18:16 +0100, Nick Brereton wrote: > How about C99's intptr_t ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de > [mailto:openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of David > Brownell > Sent: 11 May 2009 18:12 > To: Øyvind Harboe > Cc: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] svn head build issues > > On Monday 11 May 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > >> so I could either go with a union or these fancy games. > > > > > > How about using a design that doesn't rely on type punning? > > > > > > It'll be more clear to read/understand, and less fragile for > > > folk using "other" systems (e.g. 64-bit) and for developers. > > > > union? > > As a near-term answer I doubt you'll get anything better. > Longer term ... hard to say. > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
