On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Dick Hollenbeck <d...@softplc.com> wrote: > Michael Bruck wrote: >> >> So my question would be: does anyone know if the drivers produce >> different state transitions (except for idling on stable states) for >> the jtag_* calls, including more complex stuff that involves >> jtag_add_ir_scan etc. ? >> > > This is a superbly excellent question.
To which the application code should assume "yes". Different drivers *will* do different things. Use jtag_add_pathmove() when specific behaviour is required. I've updated the documentation of jtag_add_pathmove() to explain this a bit. > One that is related to my question > about WTF is the tap machine even doing while I am programming an FPGA. > This is precisely why I felt it absolutely necessary to implement state > transition logging. That exists in its earliest form on the ft2232.c patch > I just submitted. Once we have this in place for *all* drivers, then it > might actually be possible to ANSWER your most excellent question, which is > related to mine. > > You could then compare the paths taken between two cables. So each interface driver must be responsible for logging transitions as only the interface driver could possibly know(even the driver might not actually know the precise path if this is somehow implemented by lower level hardware/firmware). > > Dick > > > -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
