On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.har...@zylin.com> wrote: > > So if I understand correctly, this problem has nothing to do with > arm946es specifically, > but is rather related to OpenOCD not invalidating the instruction cache upon > writing a breakpoint instruction? > > That seems like a much more widespread problem. > > >> Openocd did not support arm946es, so I set the target to arm966e at my >> config file. The arm966e did not contain cache, so maybe this is the >> problem. >> >> Does openocd have plan to support arm946es in future? Thanks! > > Is this a separate problem? You probably need to write a separate posting > if you want to get answers to this... >
I think I understand what Xiaochen says. The issue has nothing to do with ARM946ES or the existing OpenOCD code. The issue is that ARM946E is not supported and he used ARM966E with an ARM946E chip and he found out this is the real problem in his second email. So now he is asking whether Openocd has plan to support arm946es in the future. -- Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
