On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Magnus Lundin <lun...@mlu.mine.nu> wrote: > Hi > > I have commited a patch that gives more readable error reporting for > STM32 flash writing errors. > > But still all errors are reported with the error code > ERROR_FLASH_OPERATION_FAILED (-902) as return code wich is not very > helpul about the cause of the error. > My suggestion is to return the more differentiated error codes already > available in flash.h without so many verbose messages and then generate > meaningful LOG_ERROR text messages in flash.c . > > ?????????????
I'd rather go the other way, not to try to communicate any information through error codes, i.e. to use it *only* as a boolean fail/success. There are only a few places in which the error codes are checked, and I see little reason to expose error codes to the user. -- Øyvind Harboe PayBack incident management system Reduce costs and increase quality, free Starter Edition http://www.payback.no/index_en.html _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
