On Nov 24, 2008, at 3:24 AM, Spen wrote:
Hi, I have created a release 1.0 branch: svn://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/openocd/branches/openocd_1_0_branchif no major issues are found after say 1 month then we will tag a release.I can test the st/pic32 targets, if anyone has any free time to check othertargets that would be good.Like i said before we will only add major bug fixes to this release branch,svn trunk will continue as normal. Cheers Spen _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
For 1.0, do we want to consider removing support for all the old syntaxes? Being a major release (i.e. the first one), such a change would be reasonable. The downsides are the loss of immediate backwards compatibility with old config files. The manual already contains an appendix for mapping old syntax to new, so users of old syntax wouldn't be completely abandoned. The advantages are the removal of lots of ugly code that updates the old syntax to new in- place. For things like the target command, this would easily remove 80+ lines of twisty, easy to get wrong code.
-- Rick Altherr [EMAIL PROTECTED]"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
-- Unsigned
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development