On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Spen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I'm not too familiar with that code or the problem >> w/PLL/clocks that >> >> you are seing, but I modified it to wait 1000ms rather >> than try 100 >> >> times... >> >> >> >> Seems a tad more robust to me. >> >> >> > > > This is way too long a timeout. > Probably 50ms-100ms is more suitable, otherwise openocd may appear to be > locked up.
I didn't know what to put as a timeout, but at least the timeout is now in ms instead of # of iterations. Presumably that's better. -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer Free eCos workshop in Oslo October 21! http://www.zylin.com/workshop.html _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
