On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Pavel Chromy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> 2. commands.tcl requires (1), but we *could* embed it into the >> executable instead but that addresses the symptom and not >> the disease, it will only help us short-term. > > I consider this a goo idea if OOCD functions are changed to be scripting > friendly > with a TCL frontend like in flash banks example, so that basic commands > are kept completely inside OOCD to reduce hassle for end users, especially > those > not much familiar with OOCD yet.
Thanks :-) I guess the main advantage of adding a tcl(instead of C) implementation of "flash banks" on top of the scripting friendly "flash_banks" is that that the "flash_banks" proc is now exercised(tested) by OpenOCD itself. The dust needs to settle on these latest changes, but one of the outstanding issues is to rework the help system so that tcl proc's can have help. I expect the directory layout of OpenOCD to become more, not less, important in the future. -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
