David Coutadeur wrote: > > Thank you Howard (and openldap core team) for this synthesis of the current > and future state of dynamic membership devs. > > Indeed, some of my customers were suffering from dynlist performances, and > the decision was taken to go back to more static features (like memberOf). > > For now I did not test nestgroup overlay, but I'll give a look for next > installations. Do you have any idea in which version of OpenLDAP nestgroup > will be > officially released?
Most likely 2.7 later this year. But I see no reason why it wouldn't work in 2.5/2.6. > > Regards, > > > Le 26/02/2024 à 16:54, Howard Chu a écrit : >> The recent work on expanding dynamic group functionality in the dynlist >> overlay seems to have been >> a bad idea. It makes an already fairly complex overlay even more >> complicated, and it puts a lot more >> work into the read side of operations, which adds up to quite noticeable >> slowdowns in search performance >> on deployments that make heavy use of dynamic groups with large memberships. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
