<quote who="Kurt D. Zeilenga"> > At 03:04 AM 12/8/2006, Gavin Henry wrote: >>Are we concerned with the sdf format in anyway? > > About the format, no. > >>Is it still maintained? > > Not actively. > >>Can we do everything we want with it? > > No. But s/want/need/, then yes. > >>But I have absolutely no objections to sticking with sdf. > > For now, sticking with SDF is best. But after we > upgrade some more critical pieces of infrastructure, > like the issue tracker and FAQ, we can come back to > this.
Great, as I thought. Gavin. > > Kurt > >
