While it's something we likely should consider for a future 2.3.x patch release, I rather defer to one after .16.
At 12:32 PM 1/6/2006, Pierangelo Masarati wrote: >> I'm seeing a bit of leaks in syncprov running under valgrind. I'll try to >> fix them, but I'm getting a bit lost. In case, I'll post the report. To >> reproduce, run test017 with slapd under valgrind. > >I think I've fixed all the leaks I was seeing in syncrepl, and most of >those I was seeing in syncprov. Some of them were one-timer (no resource >release at shutdown), others were not. The most significant that seems to >remain right now is the Operation + other allocated in response to >persistent syncreplications; at the end of test018 two remain allocated, >corresponding to the two times the persistent request was sent to the >producer (the consumer was stopped once during the test). So it seems >that any time a persistent request occurs, data related to it is never >freed. I haven't been able to design an appropriate fix yet. > >If you consider those fixes worth getting into re23 any soon, I think I'll >need to port them myself, because they're interspersed with other fixes, >and it's not easy to point out specific file revisions (one of the >disadvantages of working off-line during holidays...). In any case I >don't think they're critical, as they do not scale with operations, but >rather with connection failures, which are supposed to be unlikely events. > >p. > > > > >Ing. Pierangelo Masarati >Responsabile Open Solution >OpenLDAP Core Team > >SysNet s.n.c. >Via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA >http://www.sys-net.it >------------------------------------------ >Office: +39.02.23998309 >Mobile: +39.333.4963172 >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >------------------------------------------
