On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:06:07 GMT, Michael Strauß <[email protected]> wrote:

> Wouldn't it be more useful to link to the CSR for enhancements that have it? 
> The CSR contains the normative specification, which is usually more 
> interesting than the ticket that prompted the enhancement.

I'd prefer to leave it as-is for this release, and think about how we might 
want to improve this next time. A couple thoughts come to mind:

First, I see this in the JDK 25 release notes (I presume they'll do it for 26 
as well), which we might consider:

See [CSRs Approved for JDK 
25](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/issues/?filter=45707) for the list of CSRs 
closed in JDK 25

(FWIW, I just noticed a bug in the above filter -- it says JDK 25, but points 
to the JDK 24 CSRs; I'll report that)

Second, if we did want to list the CSRs for those that have them, I might want 
to list it this way, so that there i a link to the CSR, but the displayed BugID 
(also linked) is for the issue itself:

[JDK-8372203](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8372203) 
([CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8372630)) | Piecewise linear easing 
function | animation

We could do one (or both) of these in our release notes. If we do the second 
one, I'd want to have a script generate it, since I don't want to do it by hand.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2090#issuecomment-3974236587

Reply via email to