On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 16:47:14 GMT, Christopher Schnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>> @crschnick We _never_ reuse a JBS bug ID that is Resolved as Fixed. This PR >> will need a new bug. Please remove the bug ID (8374515) from the title of >> this PR and later replace it with the new bug ID. > > @kevinrushforth That bug is already a new one. I don't have control over how > newly opened bugs are handled in terms of state. > > I recently submitted a little bit more clearer instructions on how to > reproduce, but I think the original instructions were clear enough as the > method only has one catch block. @crschnick I only just noticed that you didn't have GitHub Actions enabled for your personal fork of the jfx repo. Fortunately, this is a trivial enough fix that there will be no problems (I built and tested it myself, so I know it works). If you plan to submit any more PRs, please enable GitHub Actions workflows for your personal fork. @kevinrushforth @andy-goryachev-oracle @Maran23 We should let this be a reminder to us (especially to me!) to check that a GHA test build was run before approving a PR. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2023#issuecomment-3714767584
