On Tue, 27 May 2025 17:38:05 GMT, Andy Goryachev <ango...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The other queries are standardized and universally agreed upon, whereas this >> one isn't. It's there because we have a corresponding platform preference, >> so I think a vendor prefix is in order. > > not sure what you mean by "standardized and universally agreed upon", but -fx > strikes me as confusing (is it a style?) maybe > `fx-prefers-persistent-scrollbars`? > > not a big deal though, as long as it's properly documented (it is). In the CSS universe, `foo` identifies a standardized name (i.e. it's been around long enough that everyone has agreed on it, not just a single vendor), `-fx-foo` identifies a vendor-specific name (in this case FX, other vendor-specific prefixes are `-ms-`, `-webkit-`, etc.), and `--foo` identifies a user name. That's why most JavaFX CSS property names have the `-fx-` vendor prefix (but not all: `visibility` and `transition` come without a vendor prefix). ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1655#discussion_r2109817347
