On Fri, 2 May 2025 08:22:18 GMT, Lukasz Kostyra <lkost...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Thiago Milczarek Sayao has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> Fix test on SizingTest > > modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/native-glass/gtk/GlassApplication.cpp line > 486: > >> 484: case GDK_PROPERTY_NOTIFY: >> 485: ctx->process_property_notify(&event->property); >> 486: gtk_main_do_event(event); > > Some event types first call respective `ctx->process` and then > `gtk_main_do_event`, while others do it the other way around. Is there a > specific reason why? Yes, Gtk updates the window state (maximized, fullscreen, iconified) values that are used after on the `process_configure` and `process_state`. I added a comment. > modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/native-glass/gtk/GlassRobot.cpp line 22: > >> 20: * >> 21: * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 >> USA >> 22: * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additiFonal information or have >> any > > Coincidental change in copyright header Fixed > modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/native-glass/gtk/glass_general.h line 251: > >> 249: #define LOG5(msg, param1, param2, param3, param4, param5) {printf(msg, >> param1, param2, param3, param4, param5);fflush(stdout);} >> 250: #define LOG6(msg, param1, param2, param3, param4, param5, param6) >> {printf(msg, param1, param2, param3, param4, param5, param6);fflush(stdout);} >> 251: #define LOG10(msg, param1, param2, param3, param4, param5, param6, >> param7, param8, param9, param10) \ > > Instead of adding more `LOG*` macros consider replacing them with `#define > LOG(...) { printf(__VA_ARGS__); fflush(stdout); }` > > Eventually I would accept filing a separate change for improving this if we > don't have one already. Seems like the `ERROR` macros below could also be > improved in this way. Nice tip, thanks. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1789#discussion_r2075438459 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1789#discussion_r2075440319 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1789#discussion_r2075438879