On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 16:35:39 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional 
>> commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8088343.lifecycle
>>  - 8088343
>
> modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/concurrent/Task.java line 1041:
> 
>> 1039:                     }
>> 1040:                 });
>> 1041:                 return rv.get();
> 
> This is ineffective since you don't wait for the runLater to execute (and 
> waiting could lead to deadlock, so I wouldn't recommend that). I don't think 
> there is anything better than unconditionally returning `flag` when not 
> running on the FX app thread. That's what the current code does (and is what 
> your proposed fix will do most of the time).

good point!

In this particular case, returning `true` from `cancel()` when state will not 
be changed is acceptable.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1769#discussion_r2047689677

Reply via email to