On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 07:45:57 GMT, Ambarish Rapte <ara...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Lukasz Kostyra has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Replace fail() calls with assertions
>
> modules/javafx.graphics/src/test/java/test/javafx/stage/Popup_owner_Test.java 
> line 2:
> 
>> 1: /*
>> 2:  * Copyright (c) 2011, 2025, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights 
>> reserved.
> 
> Either we should use `git mv <oldFile> <newFile>` here to retain the file 
> commit history.
> or
> As the test changed a lot from before, we could choose not to do `git mv`, in 
> the case the copyright in new file should be only 2025
> 
> I would recommend to `git mv` as a general good practice.

This was done with `git mv`. The problem is that the similarity between the old 
file and new file was too little for Git to consider this to be an actual 
rename, even when using `git mv`. I believe the similarity index threshold in 
Git is 50%.

The only way to achieve this would be to split it into two separate commits - 
rename, then rewrite - but that will still disappear since Skara will squish 
all the commits in a PR into one.

I will update the copyright header to just say `2025` since that is the case.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1763#discussion_r2034748053

Reply via email to