On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 07:45:57 GMT, Ambarish Rapte <ara...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Lukasz Kostyra has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> Replace fail() calls with assertions > > modules/javafx.graphics/src/test/java/test/javafx/stage/Popup_owner_Test.java > line 2: > >> 1: /* >> 2: * Copyright (c) 2011, 2025, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights >> reserved. > > Either we should use `git mv <oldFile> <newFile>` here to retain the file > commit history. > or > As the test changed a lot from before, we could choose not to do `git mv`, in > the case the copyright in new file should be only 2025 > > I would recommend to `git mv` as a general good practice. This was done with `git mv`. The problem is that the similarity between the old file and new file was too little for Git to consider this to be an actual rename, even when using `git mv`. I believe the similarity index threshold in Git is 50%. The only way to achieve this would be to split it into two separate commits - rename, then rewrite - but that will still disappear since Skara will squish all the commits in a PR into one. I will update the copyright header to just say `2025` since that is the case. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1763#discussion_r2034748053