On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:48:39 GMT, Michael Strauß <mstra...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> As the existing code was already pretty optimistic about 2 byte chars, is it >> possible that is already handled somewhere else? >> I'm not sure whether this is done explicitly somewhere or if CF_UNICODETEXT >> is just tried first. > > Could be, but in any case, the way it's impemented right now doesn't seem to > be right. We should only assume 2-byte characters if what's being pulled from > the clipboard is actually `CF_UNICODETEXT`. I did a little bit of digging and we will sometimes request `CF_TEXT` and `CF_OEMTEXT` (see `create_mime_stuff()` in this file). Technically we could change the pairings there and always request text data in `CF_UNICODETEXT`, but I would do some more testing and check if that doesn't cause regressions in some surprise spot. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1724#discussion_r2009765278
