On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 15:37:56 GMT, John Hendrikx <jhendr...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This provides and uses a new implementation of `ExpressionHelper`, called 
>> `ListenerManager` with improved semantics.
>> 
>> # Behavior
>> 
>> |Listener...|ExpressionHelper|ListenerManager|
>> |---|---|---|
>> |Invocation Order|In order they were registered, invalidation listeners 
>> always before change listeners|(unchanged)|
>> |Removal during Notification|All listeners present when notification started 
>> are notified, but excluded for any nested changes|Listeners are removed 
>> immediately regardless of nesting|
>> |Addition during Notification|Only listeners present when notification 
>> started are notified, but included for any nested changes|New listeners are 
>> never called during the current notification regardless of nesting|
>> 
>> ## Nested notifications:
>> 
>> | |ExpressionHelper|ListenerManager|
>> |---|---|---|
>> |Type|Depth first (call stack increases for each nested level)|(same)|
>> |# of Calls|Listeners * Depth (using incorrect old values)|Collapses nested 
>> changes, skipping non-changes|
>> |Vetoing Possible?|No|Yes|
>> |Old Value correctness|Only for listeners called before listeners making 
>> nested changes|Always|
>> 
>> # Performance
>> 
>> |Listener|ExpressionHelper|ListenerManager|
>> |---|---|---|
>> |Addition|Array based, append in empty slot, resize as needed|(same)|
>> |Removal|Array based, shift array, resize as needed|(same)|
>> |Addition during notification|Array is copied, removing collected 
>> WeakListeners in the process|Appended when notification finishes|
>> |Removal during notification|As above|Entry is `null`ed (to avoid moving 
>> elements in array that is being iterated)|
>> |Notification completion with changes|-|Null entries (and collected 
>> WeakListeners) are removed|
>> |Notifying Invalidation Listeners|1 ns each|(same)|
>> |Notifying Change Listeners|1 ns each (*)|2-3 ns each|
>> 
>> (*) a simple for loop is close to optimal, but unfortunately does not 
>> provide correct old values
>> 
>> # Memory Use 
>> 
>> Does not include alignment, and assumes a 32-bit VM or one that is using 
>> compressed oops.
>> 
>> |Listener|ExpressionHelper|ListenerManager|OldValueCaching ListenerManager|
>> |---|---|---|---|
>> |No Listeners|none|none|none|
>> |Single InvalidationListener|16 bytes overhead|none|none|
>> |Single ChangeListener|20 bytes overhead|none|16 bytes overhead|
>> |Multiple listeners|57 + 4 per listener (excluding unused slots)|57 + 4 per 
>> listener (excluding unused slots)|61 + 4 per listener (excluding unused 
>> slots)|
>> 
>> # About nested changes
>> 
>> Nested changes are simply changes...
>
> John Hendrikx has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Fix fix for regression :)

<h3>Edge Case: A listener upon notification removes an earlier listener, then 
makes a nested change</h3>

|ExpressionHelper|This PR|Specification|
|---|---|---|
|The removed listener is not notified of the initial or nested change|The 
removed listener is not notified of the initial or nested change|Leave 
unspecified|

Opinion: as this operates on the same property on which you already have a 
listener, and the listener you removed must be something you have a reference 
to (and so probably created yourself), this case makes little sense in real 
world applications. We should leave it unspecified.

<h3>Edge Case: A listener upon notification removes a later listener, then 
makes a nested change</h3>

|ExpressionHelper|This PR|Specification|
|---|---|---|
|The removed listener is still notified of the initial change that triggered 
the initial notification as lists are copied|A removed listener is under no 
circumstances notified after removal|Leave unspecified|

Opinion: as this operates on the same property on which you already have a 
listener, and the listener you removed must be something you have a reference 
to (and so probably created yourself), this case makes little sense in real 
world applications. We should leave it unspecified.

<h3>Edge Case: A listener upon notification adds a listener, then makes a 
nested change</h3>

|ExpressionHelper|This PR|Specification|
|---|---|---|
|The added listener is notified of the nested change, but not of the initial 
change|The added listener is not notified of the initial change, nor of the 
nested change|Leave unspecified|

Opinion: as this operates on the same property on which you already have a 
listener, the added listener is superfluous; this case also makes little sense 
in real world applications. We should leave it unspecified.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1081#issuecomment-2671717626

Reply via email to