> Modified the resize algorithm to work well with fractional scale, thanks for > deeper understanding of the problem thanks to @hjohn and @mstr2 . > > Removed earlier manual tester in favor of the monkey tester. > > It is important to note that even though the constraints are given by the > user in unsnapped coordinates, they are converted to snapped values, since > the snapped values correspond to the actual pixels on the display. This > means the tests that validate honoring constraints should, in all the cases > where (scale != 1.0), assume possibly error not exceeding (1.0 / scale).
Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 41 commits: - review comments - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8299753.resize - Merge branch 'master' into 8299753.resize - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8299753.resize - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8299753.resize - in case of hitting min max - Merge branch 'master' into 8299753.resize - Merge branch 'master' into 8299753.resize - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8299753.resize - Merge branch 'master' into 8299753.resize - ... and 31 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/compare/a1765747...5464d7ee ------------- Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx&pr=1156&range=06 Stats: 1176 lines in 8 files changed: 155 ins; 929 del; 92 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1156/head:pull/1156 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1156
